30 climate and health groups warn UK government against weakening ZEV mandate
By Eve
A coalition of 30 organisations, including WWF, Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth, has warned the UK government that diluting the Zero Emission Vehicle mandate would be an act of economic self harm. A formal consultation is underway exploring options to lower annual percentage targets for new zero emission cars and vans, with the Financial Times reporting that the Burnham administration is now considering a 60% target for 2030, up from an earlier proposal of 50% but down from the current 80% requirement. The 100% zero emission target for 2035 remains fixed.
Why it matters
Any weakening of the ZEV mandate could slow EV adoption rates and reduce the urgency for charge point operators to expand infrastructure ahead of 2030. Lower sales targets may also affect public sector procurement timelines and the business case for workplace and destination charging investments.
Source
- Original title
- “Health and climate leaders issue stark warning to government over ZEV mandate U-turn”
- Published
- 21 October 2026
- Updated
- 22 October 2026
- Also covered by
- transportandenergy.com
In this story
- Topic
- Policy & Market
- Place
- United Kingdom
Related news
TfL consults on zero-emission mandate for new private hire vehicles from July 2028
Transport for London has opened a consultation running until 2 December 2026 on requiring all newly licensed private hire vehicles to be zero-emission from July 2028, with wheelchair accessible vehicles following in July 2030. TfL forecasts the proposals would cut private hire vehicle NOx emissions by 9% and CO2 emissions by 35% over the first ten years, rising to a 97% reduction over eighteen years. More than 70% of private hire vehicles are now zero-emission capable, though many still produce exhaust emissions when not operating in electric mode.
Why it matters
The consultation sets a firm timeline for zero-emission private hire licensing in London, signalling demand for charging infrastructure to support a fleet transition and giving vehicle manufacturers clarity on wheelchair accessible vehicle requirements. Operators and charge point providers will need to plan for increased electric vehicle adoption across the private hire sector from 2028 onwards.
Budget incentives could spur 61% of drivers to buy EVs sooner
A survey of 1,500 UK drivers by road safety technology company Ooono found that 61% would consider bringing forward an electric vehicle purchase if the Government introduced additional financial incentives in the Autumn Budget. Of those surveyed, 21% said they would definitely accelerate their EV purchase with new incentives, while 40% said they possibly would, and 11% are already planning to purchase an electric vehicle. However, 55% of respondents cited concerns over government support and the possibility of additional charges, such as electric Vehicle Excise Duty pay per mile taxation, as reasons not to make the switch.
Why it matters
The research suggests that government policy decisions on incentives and taxation could significantly influence the pace of EV adoption in Britain, which in turn affects the scale and timing of charging infrastructure investment needed to support the transition. Uncertainty over future policy is currently holding back potential EV buyers, creating unpredictability for charge point operators planning network expansion.
Midterm Democratic gains unlikely to reverse Trump EV rollbacks, S&P Global warns
Even if Democrats win majorities in both the Senate and House of Representatives in the upcoming midterm elections, they would struggle to restore EV tax credits or stricter Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards rolled back by the Trump administration, according to S&P Global. Any new legislation would face a presidential veto, and overriding that requires a two thirds congressional majority that Democrats are highly unlikely to achieve. Jeff Meyer, director at CERA, described overcoming a veto as a very high hurdle.
Why it matters
The analysis suggests US federal EV incentives and regulatory support will remain constrained regardless of midterm outcomes, meaning charging infrastructure developers should continue planning around state level programmes and private sector demand rather than expecting renewed federal backing in the near term.